Il forum dei Drow, dei Vampiri e delle creature dell'oscurità
Oggi è gio mar 28, 2024 13:56

Tutti gli orari sono UTC + 1 ora [ ora legale ]





Apri un nuovo argomento Rispondi all’argomento  [ 2 messaggi ] 
Autore Messaggio
 Oggetto del messaggio: antonio calipari
MessaggioInviato: gio mag 04, 2006 18:44 
Non connesso
Avatar utente
 Profilo

Iscritto il: ven giu 24, 2005 21:52
Messaggi: 804
Località: underdark(roma)
http://www.unita.it/view.asp?IDcontent=56045
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/sezion ... -nomi.html


Il dipartimento di Giustizia Usa ha comunicato "in modo definitivo"
di non poter fornire ulteriori informazioni sulla morte del funzionario del Sismi

Washington non darà i nomi
del commando che uccise Calipari
No alla richiesta per rogatoria della procura di Roma
Castelli: "Non hanno giovato polemiche con pm Milano"


Nicola Calipari
ROMA - Il dipartimento di Giustizia di Washington ha comunicato "in modo definitivo" al ministero della Giustizia italiano di non poter fornire ulteriori informazioni oltre a quelle contenute nel rapporto del Multi National Corps-Iraq, già trasmesso al governo italiano, in relazione alla morte in Iraq del funzionario del Sismi Nicola Calipari.

In altre parole, non verranno resi noti ufficialmente i nomi del componenti del commando militare Usa chiesti per rogatoria dalla procura di Roma che indaga sulle circostanze dell'uccisione di Calipari, subito dopo il rilascio della giornalista Giuliana Sgrena, a un posto di blocco Usa a Bagdad.

Il ministro della Giustizia, Roberto Castelli, ha espresso "amarezza" per il rifiuto delle autorità di Washington. Tuttavia, il Guardasigilli - dai microfoni di Radio 24 - ha parlato di una vicenda "lunga e complessa" finita in maniera non positiva per l'Italia forse anche a causa delle "polemiche con la procura di Milano che possono aver influenzato questa decisione" americana.

Il riferimento implicito è al braccio di ferro degli ultimi mesi tra il ministro e i magistrati di Milano che avevano chiesto l'estradizione dei 22 agenti Cia accusati del rapimento dell'ex imam Abu Omar. Castelli ha rifiutato di inoltrare la richiesta della procura di Milano e lo ha comunicato solo di recente, facendo intendere che il suo non decidere in tempi rapidi stava a significare che proprio la questione dell'estradizione degli agenti Cia poteva rappresentare uno strumento di pressione nei confronti degli Usa per ottenere risposte positive ad altre rogatorie, tra cui quella relativa alla morte di Calipari. "Il ministero ha fatto di tutto, e anche di più, per avere una risposta diversa" dagli Usa sulla vicenda Calipari. "Questo mi lascia con l'amaro in bocca".

In realtà i nomi dei componenti della pattuglia statunitense in servizio al check-point erano già emersi in seguito all'inchiesta condotta sull'episodio dal Ros (Raggruppamento operativo speciale) dei carabinieri. In particolare il nome del militare statunitense Mario Lozano fu reso noto grazie all'eliminazione degli omissis dal rapporto redatto dalla Commissione d'inchiesta statunitense sulla morte di Calipari, reso noto un anno fa dalla Farnesina.

Lo scorso dicembre i magistrati della procura di Roma avevano formulato l'ipotesi di omicidio volontario nei confronti del soldato Usa e predisposto una rogatoria per l'identificazione dei componenti della pattuglia americana, senza però ottenere alcun esito.

Nel comunicare il rifiuto a fornire altre informazioni sulle circostanze in cui morì il funzionario del Sismi, il dipartimento di Giustizia di Washington - si legge nella nota di via Arenula - ha espresso il "cordoglio per la tragica morte del dottor Nicola Calipari e il rammarico per le lesioni riportate da Giuliana Sgrena e dal militare Andrea Carpani, in data 24 aprile 2006".

Quanto alla rogatoria relativa ai tragici fatti di Nassiriya, accaduti il 12 novembre 2003, le stesse autorità statunitensi il 20 marzo 2006 hanno dichiarato la propria disponibilità a mettere a disposizione una persona, detenuta in Iraq e ritenuta responsabile, insieme ad altri, della strage dei nostri militari, per un interrogatorio tramite video conferenza. Allo stato attuale, sono in corso contatti per definire le modalità di assunzione dell'interrogatorio.

(4 maggio 2006)




non ho parole.

_________________
del senno di poi son piene le fosse.

il loro dio non salva,non aiuta,non protegge e spesso la loro fede è una maschera sotto cui si cela il peggio dell'animo umano

Immagine

Immagine


Top
 

 Oggetto del messaggio: Re: antonio calipari
MessaggioInviato: lun dic 20, 2010 22:01 
Non connesso
Moderatore
Avatar utente
 ICQ  Profilo

Iscritto il: sab feb 28, 2004 21:16
Messaggi: 6638
Località: Palermo
Monday, 09 May 2005, 15:53
S E C R E T ROME 001593
SIPDIS
BAGHDAD PLEASE PASS TO BG">BG VANGJEL;
JUSTICE FOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, CRIMINAL DIVISION
EO 12958 DECL: 05/08/2015
TAGS PREL, MOPS, KJUS, IT, IZ, IRAQI FREEDOM
SUBJECT: IRAQ/ITALY: BERLUSCONI IN PARLIAMENT ON CALIPARI-
STRESSES GOOD RELATIONS AND COOPERATION WITH US, COMMITMENT TO IRAQ; ALSO MENTIONS WITHDRAWAL PLANS
REF: ROME 1506
Classified By: DCM Emil Skodon, reasons 1.4 b and d.
1. (S) Summary and Recommendation: On May 5-6, PM Berlusconi spoke to both houses of Parliament about the joint investigation and separate reports of the March 4 shooting of Italian Intelligence officer Nicola Calipari by US forces near Baghdad. While Berlusconi defended the Italian report and took issue with some of the US report's findings (see synopsis of his remarks at para 3), he reaffirmed the points of most importance to us: the incident was unintentional; US-Italy relations and our alliance remain strong; and Italy remains committed to its involvement in Iraq. We continue to recommend letting the US report speak for us rather than prolonging public debate. While the issue appears to be losing steam here, we still must deal with the MLAT requests and the possibility of a continuing investigation by Italian prosecutors. End summary and recommendation

2. (U) On May 5, PM Berlusconi briefed the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate on the Italian and US reports that concluded the work of the joint investigation in to the March 4 shooting of Italian Intelligence officer Nicola Calipari by US forces near Baghdad. Berlusconi, in televised session, was flanked by FM Fini and other cabinet ministers. A debate followed. A synopsis of his remarks, as reported in the Chamber of Deputies transcript follows (his report to the Senate was nearly identical).

3. (U) Begin synopsis of transcript:

The impossibility of reaching shared conclusions....certainly mean that the joint investigation...was not able to bring its task to full completion. Nonetheless, it is also true that the US decision to open a joint investigation with Italy is unprecedented and came in response to a request by the Italian government. Investigations were objectively conditioned by the lack of preservation of the scene of the incident. This notwithstanding, the work of the joint investigation team was carried out in a climate of strong mutual cooperation and the Italian members of the team had full access to -- and were enabled to acquire -- all the information available.

Discrepancies between the Italian and American reports turned out to be irreducible and I will certainly not be the one to minimize the size of the disagreement. Discrepancies in the two texts touch on aspects that are far from being marginal. The US considered reliable testimony and data that do not coincide with what we collected and which we found were reliable. In particular, the declarations by the two Italian survivors are in contrast with those by the US military. Given that the impartiality and good faith of the US investigators cannot be under discussion, and I think we all agree on this, we cannot but respect their conclusions, noting that they do not coincide with ours. This is even the opinion of the Americans on our results and also, their report converges with ours on this -- it recognizes that not everything worked as it should have in preparing/locating and managing that blocking position.

Both sides, however, recognize that the incident was unintentional and both sides recognize the need to take concrete operational measures to avoid similar occurrences in the future. Still, one thing is to conclude like the Americans did, because of disciplinary measures, and another is to underscore, as we did -- and I quote -- on the basis of acquired evidence that there was a lack of intention . The absence of criminal intent -- the intention -- does not rule out the guilt/responsibility that is ascribable to negligence, imprudence or even simply inexperience. And this, you will agree, is not a small difference. The Italian report concluded that the blocking positions was irregular. It was set up with no written or specific instructions and was located where it had little visibility and could not protect the security of the military manning it nor that of drivers of vehicles approaching it. Accusations and criticism of the Government for how it managed the Calipari case and for the conclusion of the joint investigation are paradoxical. If we believe one vision of the facts is credible rather than another, it evidently cannot be friendship to make one change one's mind. This is elementary and holds true for both the US and Italy.

The friendship between Italy and the US is not under discussion. The alliance and the friendship with the United states have solid foundations, foundations that we are committed to consolidating every day against the threat of totalitarianism and terrorism. Our friendship has overcome even more difficult tests. To this day, Italy recognizes itself in the Le Monde headline after the 9/11 tragedy that read, "We are all Americans."

Our commitment to do what is possible to ascertain the truth and possible responsibilities remains unchanged. It is a commitment we intend to honor, first and foremost for the respect we owe to the memory of Nicola Calipari. The Italian judiciary can count on the firm support of the Government. I want to free the ground from any misunderstanding: there is no connection between the investigation into the circumstances of the death of Calipari and the continuation of the Italian commitment toward reconstruction in Iraq...We do not intend to establish any kind of link between the assessment of the event in which our official lost his life and Italy's role in Iraq. Italy is in Iraq in compliance with a UN Security Council Resolution.

End synopsis of transcript.

4. (U) In response to press questions after the debate, Berlusconi said:

The Center-Left opposition's attitude was "responsible," because they did not place under discussion the alliance nor the friendship with the US. The opposition continues to ask for our withdrawal from Iraq, which is in the plans, in agreement with the Iraq government and the allies. In the past, we have made announcements to this effect and we hold to this prospect. There is no reason today to say, "everybody home." It would sound irresponsible and incomprehensible. On the progressive withdrawal of troops from Iraq we already announced our position some time ago. We already discussed it with our main allies. We will continue to talk with them. A progressive reduction of our presence will certainly occur. I had even given an indication of when. Everything will be in agreement with the Iraqi government and with our allies. I even spoke about it directly and personally with Bush and Blair. Therefore, we continue in this direction. An international conference on Iraq will soon take place. Italian efforts for the reconstruction of Iraq are not isolated and even NATO and the EU are now involved.

5. (S) COMMENT: Berlusconi's remarks, while reassuring on Iraq and on US-Italy relations, also reflect a position he and his government staked out on the Calipari case from the beginning: a commitment to fix responsibility. Although this commitment was not actually included in the joint investigation's terms of reference, Berlusconi evidently felt an obligation to adhere to it. We believe this was at the heart of US-Italian disagreements over the joint investigation conclusions and set the tone of both the Italian report and Berlusconi's remarks to Parliament. In particular, the determination to avoid any criticism of Calipari's own role led the Italian government and investigators to ignore a question that seemed obvious to the US investigation: out of the 30 cars that came to the blocking position, why was this the only car fired upon that night? As in Reftel, we continue to urge Washington to discourage USG spokespeople from point-by-point refutation of the Italian report or Berlusconi's remarks. As much as possible, we should allow our report to speak for itself on our view of the incident. This will hasten the fading of the case from the political radar screen.



Belllo.
6. (U) Baghdad minimize considered.

SEMBLER

NNNN 2005ROME01593 - Classification: SECRET

_________________
Immagine


Top
 

Visualizza ultimi messaggi:  Ordina per  
Apri un nuovo argomento Rispondi all’argomento  [ 2 messaggi ] 

Tutti gli orari sono UTC + 1 ora [ ora legale ]



Chi c’è in linea

Visitano il forum: Nessuno e 6 ospiti


Non puoi aprire nuovi argomenti
Non puoi rispondere negli argomenti
Non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
Non puoi cancellare i tuoi messaggi

Cerca per:
Vai a:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design by Muzedon.com  
Traduzione Italiana phpBBItalia.net basata su phpBB.it 2010